Optimize DC Plans for Mergers & Acquisitions Success
Mergers and Acquisitions: Defined Contribution Plan Management
Mergers and acquisitions take many forms, and each has significant implications regarding retirement benefits and how they may (or may not) change. To illustrate, let’s compare two types of corporate transactions — the asset purchase versus the stock purchase. In an asset purchase, whether the acquiring company becomes the sponsor of the seller’s retirement plan is subject to negotiation. In contrast, with a stock purchase, the buyer automatically becomes the sponsor of the acquired company’s retirement plan, unless the plan is terminated prior to the closing of the transaction. Additional considerations include whether employees of the company being acquired have “protected benefits” under the seller’s plan — including vesting schedule, early versus normal retirement age and conditions for withdrawals.
How any protected benefits stack up in both plans can be a determining factor in whether it makes more sense to merge the plans or run them separately. There are a host of other retirement plan factors — including employer matching contribution formulas, testing methods, highly compensated employee determinations and Roth contributions — that should be reviewed before determining how to handle the retirement plan aspect of a merger or acquisition. Hence, it’s crucial to conduct a side-by-side comparison of the features of both organizations’ plans. A compliance review of the two existing plans also should be conducted to see whether there are any issues that may affect the plans’ qualified status. This can help prevent any unwelcome surprises down the road.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information on merger and acquisition considerations, please contact your PNC representative.